[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170803152735.GC20783@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 16:27:36 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, oleg@...hat.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 1/4] mm: Rework {set,clear,mm}_tlb_flush_pending()
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 01:38:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Commit:
>
> af2c1401e6f9 ("mm: numa: guarantee that tlb_flush_pending updates are visible before page table updates")
>
> added smp_mb__before_spinlock() to set_tlb_flush_pending(). I think we
> can solve the same problem without this barrier.
>
> If instead we mandate that mm_tlb_flush_pending() is used while
> holding the PTL we're guaranteed to observe prior
> set_tlb_flush_pending() instances.
>
> For this to work we need to rework migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page()
> a little and move the test up into do_huge_pmd_numa_page().
>
> NOTE: this relies on flush_tlb_range() to guarantee:
>
> (1) it ensures that prior page table updates are visible to the
> page table walker and
> (2) it ensures that subsequent memory accesses are only made
> visible after the invalidation has completed
Works for me:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists