linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] FPGA Manager support for FPP via FT232H FT245-FIFO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Aug 2017 09:06:24 -0700
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Eric Schwarz <eas@...optimization.com>
Cc:     Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>, Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fpga-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] FPGA Manager support for FPP via FT232H FT245-FIFO

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:30:36PM +0200, Eric Schwarz wrote:
> Hello Alan,
> 
> many thanks for your response.
> Well, I am following the whole discussion from the very start and for my
> taste it is too superficial - don't know whether this is the right wording.
> Please get me right. We need some kind of implementation specification or a
> sample way on how to implement stuff. At some point I honestly lost track,
> thus I was asking for a summary so in the end the result is what we want. If
> it is clear to everyone what shall be done it should not be kind of a big
> deal to quickly sum it up which I/we would highly appreciate.

That's up to the patch submitter to deal with, it's not our job to
provide summaries of each patch review for everyone, otherwise that
would be all that we would ever be writing :)

good luck!

greg k-h