linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: Add Spreadtrum I2C controller documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMz4kuKdf-1SA_9mi6B2Q8MWBD-35JUs5U_=eQPYXA390=TZpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2017 17:05:37 +0800
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: Add Spreadtrum I2C
 controller documentation

Hi Wolfram,

On 3 August 2017 at 17:00, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Sorry for noise. I just afraid Wolfram missed this patchset since I
>> did not get any comments from V4.
>
> I use patchwork. Patches don't get lost :)
>
> Anyway, I nearly finished a document I can point people to when they
> wonder what happened about their patches.
>
> I hope this will help because I don't have the bandwidth to reply to
> ping mails individually and explain the situation.

That's great. I can understand and thanks for your feedback. I will
keep calm down and wit for comments.

-- 
Baolin.wang
Best Regards