[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1957547.1DvPFJ11E3@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 14:57:39 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_can_do_remote_dvfs()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
The if () in cpufreq_can_do_remote_dvfs() is superfluous, so drop
it and simply return the value of the expression under it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
On top of the current linux-next.
---
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -578,11 +578,8 @@ static inline bool cpufreq_can_do_remote
* - dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu flag is set
* - the local and remote CPUs share cpufreq policy
*/
- if (policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu ||
- cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), policy->cpus))
- return true;
-
- return false;
+ return policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu ||
+ cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), policy->cpus);
}
/*********************************************************************
Powered by blists - more mailing lists