[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170805051434.GB23214@nazgul.tnic>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 07:14:34 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>
Cc: "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] ACPI / APEI: add OSC APEI bit check for ghes_edac
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 08:49:51PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> Some firmware features can be enabled / disabled in BIOS. While HPE
> firmware does not allow to disable FF, it's possible that other vendors
> might allow such and still have the same OEM ID info.
Yeah, we don't protect ourselves against "might allow". Either you have
an *actual* example for such platform or you don't and then you don't
need this check.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists