[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170805051615.GC23214@nazgul.tnic>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 07:16:15 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>
Cc: "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] ghes_edac: avoid multiple calls to dmi_walk()
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 09:02:17PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> GHES platform devices correspond to GHES entries, which define firmware
> interfaces to report generic memory errors to the OS, such as NMI and
> SCI. These devices are associated with all DIMMs, not a particular
> DIMM.
And? Stating the obvious brings you what exactly?
IOW, you still haven't answered my question.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists