[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+tarBMM-frN+V9GYa-ZAzfJO4sv2owdOS3Ks+urned1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 18:15:03 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Removing full paths from DT full_name
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> This series is the last steps to remove storing the full path for every
> DT node. Instead, we can create full path strings dynamically as needed
> with printf %pOF specifiers (commit ce4fecf1fe15). There are a number of
> remaining direct users of full_name after this series. I don't believe
> there should be any functional impact for those users with the change to
> only the node name (+unit-address). The majority are for struct
> resource.name. This should only affect /proc/iomem display.
>
> Patches 1 and 2 can be applied now for 4.14. For patches 3 and 4, my
> target is 4.15 after all the dependencies have been merged.
>
> PPC folks, Please test! The PPC parts are untested. A git branch with
> all the dependencies is here[1].
PPC folks, any chance to test this?
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists