[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4689.1502267949@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 09:39:09 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
autofs mailing list <autofs@...r.kernel.org>,
Ondrej Holy <oholy@...hat.com>,
Colin Walters <walters@...hat.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] autofs - fix AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT not being honored
Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net> wrote:
> In order to handle the AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT for both system calls the
> negative dentry case in follow_automount() needs to be changed to
> return ENOENT when the LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT flag is clear (and the other
> required flags are clear).
Should the be EREMOTE instead of ENOENT?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists