lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170809015113.GB32338@bbox>
Date:   Wed, 9 Aug 2017 10:51:13 +0900
From:   Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
        "karam . lee" <karam.lee@....com>, seungho1.park@....com,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, jack@...e.cz,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, kernel-team <kernel-team@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] fs: use on-stack-bio if backing device has
 BDI_CAP_SYNC capability

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 06:29:04AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 05:49:59AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > +	struct bio sbio;
> > +	struct bio_vec sbvec;
> 
> ... this needs to be sbvec[nr_pages], of course.
> 
> > -		bio = mpage_alloc(bdev, blocks[0] << (blkbits - 9),
> > +		if (bdi_cap_synchronous_io(inode_to_bdi(inode))) {
> > +			bio = &sbio;
> > +			bio_init(bio, &sbvec, nr_pages);
> 
> ... and this needs to be 'sbvec', not '&sbvec'.

I don't get it why we need sbvec[nr_pages].
On-stack-bio works with per-page.
May I miss something?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ