[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170809023122.GF31390@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 19:31:22 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
"karam . lee" <karam.lee@....com>, seungho1.park@....com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, jack@...e.cz,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, kernel-team <kernel-team@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] fs: use on-stack-bio if backing device has
BDI_CAP_SYNC capability
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 10:51:13AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 06:29:04AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 05:49:59AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > + struct bio sbio;
> > > + struct bio_vec sbvec;
> >
> > ... this needs to be sbvec[nr_pages], of course.
> >
> > > - bio = mpage_alloc(bdev, blocks[0] << (blkbits - 9),
> > > + if (bdi_cap_synchronous_io(inode_to_bdi(inode))) {
> > > + bio = &sbio;
> > > + bio_init(bio, &sbvec, nr_pages);
> >
> > ... and this needs to be 'sbvec', not '&sbvec'.
>
> I don't get it why we need sbvec[nr_pages].
> On-stack-bio works with per-page.
> May I miss something?
The way I redid it, it will work with an arbitrary number of pages.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists