lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1613ba5c-9441-4aa8-6cdf-28af790eeaa6@xilinx.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2017 08:31:00 +0200
From:   Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <monstr@...str.eu>
CC:     Sai Krishna Potthuri <lakshmi.sai.krishna.potthuri@...inx.com>,
        Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
        <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: Fix coding style violations

On 8.8.2017 17:52, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 14:04 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> From: Sai Krishna Potthuri <lakshmi.sai.krishna.potthuri@...inx.com>
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc.h b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc.h
> []
>> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ struct xadc_ops {
>>  	int (*setup)(struct platform_device *pdev, struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>>  			int irq);
>>  	void (*update_alarm)(struct xadc *, unsigned int);
>> -	unsigned long (*get_dclk_rate)(struct xadc *);
>> +	unsigned long (*get_dclk_rate)(struct xadc *xadc);
>>  	irqreturn_t (*interrupt_handler)(int, void *);
> 
> Doesn't it seem odd to you that the lines above and below
> have the same form?
> 
> checkpatch is an imperfect tool.
> It will always be imperfect.
> Please use your eyes and mind too.

You are right. I have missed that in internal review. Fixed in v2.

Thanks,
Michal


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ