[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170810173533.GA11600@ls3530.fritz.box>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 19:35:33 +0200
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] printk-formats.txt: Add examples for %pS and %pF
Sometimes people seems unclear when to use the %pS or %pF printk format.
Adding some examples may help to avoid such mistakes.
See for example commit 51d96dc2e2dc ("random: fix warning message on ia64 and
parisc") which fixed such a wrong format string.
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
diff --git a/Documentation/printk-formats.txt b/Documentation/printk-formats.txt
index 65ea591..be8c05b 100644
--- a/Documentation/printk-formats.txt
+++ b/Documentation/printk-formats.txt
@@ -73,6 +73,12 @@ actually function descriptors which must first be resolved. The ``F`` and
``f`` specifiers perform this resolution and then provide the same
functionality as the ``S`` and ``s`` specifiers.
+Examples::
+
+ printk("Called from %pS.\n", __builtin_return_address(0));
+ printk("Called from %pS.\n", (void *)regs->ip);
+ printk("Called from %pF.\n", &gettimeofday);
+
Kernel Pointers
===============
Powered by blists - more mailing lists