lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170810173651.GB90916@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2017 10:36:51 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
To:     "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@...il.com>
Cc:     Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, kernel-team@...com,
        squashfs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] lib: Add zstd modules

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:57:01AM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> Also didn't think to mention this, but I could see the max level
> being very popular for use with SquashFS root filesystems used in
> LiveCD's. Currently, they have to decide between read performance
> and image size, while zstd would provide both.

The high compression levels of Zstandard are indeed a great fit for SquashFS,
but SquashFS images are created in userspace by squashfs-tools.  The kernel only
needs to be able to decompress them.

(Also, while Zstandard provides very good tradeoffs and will probably become the
preferred algorithm for SquashFS, it's misleading to imply that users won't have
to make decisions anymore.  It does not compress as well as XZ or decompress as
fast as LZ4, except maybe in very carefully crafted benchmarks.)

Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ