[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64d3c483-076b-1362-b284-30dda704f80c@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 16:09:26 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@...hat.com>
Cc: jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: Reduce BUG if total_sg > virtqueue size to
WARN.
On 10/08/2017 23:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> Then we probably should fail probe if vq size is too small.
>> What does this mean?
>
> We must prevent driver from submitting s/g lists > vq size to device.
What is the rationale for the limit? It makes no sense if indirect
descriptors are available, especially because...
> Either tell linux to avoid s/g lists that are too long, or
> simply fail request if this happens, or refuse to attach driver to device.
>
> Later option would look something like this within probe:
>
> for (i = VIRTIO_SCSI_VQ_BASE; i < num_vqs; i++)
> if (vqs[i]->num < MAX_SG_USED_BY_LINUX)
> goto err;
>
>
> I don't know what's MAX_SG_USED_BY_LINUX though.
>
... both virtio-blk and virtio-scsi transmit their own value for the
maximum sg list size (max_seg in virtio-scsi, seg_max in virtio-blk).
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists