[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170811201843-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 20:23:58 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@...hat.com>, jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: Reduce BUG if total_sg > virtqueue size to
WARN.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 04:09:26PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 10/08/2017 23:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> Then we probably should fail probe if vq size is too small.
> >> What does this mean?
> >
> > We must prevent driver from submitting s/g lists > vq size to device.
>
> What is the rationale for the limit?
So the host knows what it needs to support.
> It makes no sense if indirect
> descriptors are available, especially because...
>
> > Either tell linux to avoid s/g lists that are too long, or
> > simply fail request if this happens, or refuse to attach driver to device.
> >
> > Later option would look something like this within probe:
> >
> > for (i = VIRTIO_SCSI_VQ_BASE; i < num_vqs; i++)
> > if (vqs[i]->num < MAX_SG_USED_BY_LINUX)
> > goto err;
> >
> >
> > I don't know what's MAX_SG_USED_BY_LINUX though.
> >
>
> ... both virtio-blk and virtio-scsi transmit their own value for the
> maximum sg list size (max_seg in virtio-scsi, seg_max in virtio-blk).
>
> Paolo
No other device has it, and it seemed like a good idea to
limit it generally at the time.
we can fix the spec to relax the requirement for blk and scsi -
want to submit a proposal? Alternatively, add a generic field
for that.
For a quick fix, make sure vq size is >= max sg.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists