[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170812160743.GB17312@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 09:07:43 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/16] 4.9.43-stable review
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 05:36:08AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 08/11/2017 03:01 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.43 release.
> > There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun Aug 13 22:01:23 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Build results:
> total: 145 pass: 145 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> total: 122 pass: 110 fail: 12
> Failed tests:
> arm:beagle:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle
> arm:beaglexm:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle-xm
> arm:overo:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-overo-tobi
> arm:sabrelite:multi_v7_defconfig:imx6dl-sabrelite
> arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
> arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
> arm:vexpress-a15-a7:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7
> arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc702
> arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc706
> arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zed
> arm:midway:multi_v7_defconfig:ecx-2000
> arm:smdkc210:multi_v7_defconfig:exynos4210-smdkv310
>
> Failures are:
>
> Error log:
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3-nanopi-m1.dtb', needed by '__build'. Stop.
>
> This is due to 'ARM: dts: sun8i: Support DTB build for NanoPi M1'. The associated .dts
> file is missing in 4.9. Also applying 10efbf5f1633, which introduces it, won't be
> sufficient since it depends on additional commits.
Ugh, Sasha got this wrong, and I didn't check it :(
It's in 4.9.42, so this should have failed there too. I'll go revert
this now, thanks for letting me know.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists