[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <848afbf2-ee63-b400-556c-7da0f48cf174@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 09:27:40 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/16] 4.9.43-stable review
On 08/12/2017 09:07 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 05:36:08AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 08/11/2017 03:01 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.43 release.
>>> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Sun Aug 13 22:01:23 UTC 2017.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Build results:
>> total: 145 pass: 145 fail: 0
>> Qemu test results:
>> total: 122 pass: 110 fail: 12
>> Failed tests:
>> arm:beagle:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle
>> arm:beaglexm:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle-xm
>> arm:overo:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-overo-tobi
>> arm:sabrelite:multi_v7_defconfig:imx6dl-sabrelite
>> arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
>> arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
>> arm:vexpress-a15-a7:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7
>> arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc702
>> arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc706
>> arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zed
>> arm:midway:multi_v7_defconfig:ecx-2000
>> arm:smdkc210:multi_v7_defconfig:exynos4210-smdkv310
>>
>> Failures are:
>>
>> Error log:
>> make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3-nanopi-m1.dtb', needed by '__build'. Stop.
>>
>> This is due to 'ARM: dts: sun8i: Support DTB build for NanoPi M1'. The associated .dts
>> file is missing in 4.9. Also applying 10efbf5f1633, which introduces it, won't be
>> sufficient since it depends on additional commits.
>
> Ugh, Sasha got this wrong, and I didn't check it :(
>
> It's in 4.9.42, so this should have failed there too. I'll go revert
> this now, thanks for letting me know.
>
Yes, that is correct. Sorry, I must have dropped the ball there;
I thought I had told you that the builds are failing, but I guess
it got lost in the other failures.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists