linux-kernel - Re: Allow automatic kernel taint on unsigned module load to be disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACdnJusrO0rThxt0ikapFVWtJZVaiYj8AJ_oFOczskRKS4fVpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:50:17 -0400
From:   Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>
To:     Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: Allow automatic kernel taint on unsigned module load to be disabled

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org> wrote:
> I think I'm missing some context here. Could you provide some more
> background and help me understand why we want to go into all this
> trouble just to avoid a taint?  Was there a recent bug report, mailing
> list discussion, etc. that spurred you to write this patch? I'm not
> understanding why this particular taint is undesirable.

Hi Jessica,

Does the version in https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/7/764 make this clearer?