linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 24/28] drm/vc4: switch to drm_*_get(), drm_*

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2017 23:06:31 +0300
From:   Cihangir Akturk <cakturk@...il.com>
To:     Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc:     daniel@...ll.ch, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/28] drm/vc4: switch to drm_*_get(), drm_*_put()
 helpers

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:47:01PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Cihangir Akturk <cakturk@...il.com> writes:
> 
> > Use drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() helpers instead of drm_*_reference()
> > and drm_*_unreference() helpers.
> >
> > drm_*_reference() and drm_*_unreference() functions are just
> > compatibility alias for drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() and should not be
> > used by new code. So convert all users of compatibility functions to
> > use the new APIs.
> 
> Mind if I change the subject line to "drm/vc4: Continue the switch to
> drm_*_put() helpers"? to distinguish from the patch that already landed?

It's OK with me. Go ahead, change to whatever you want.

> 
> (Looks like your previous patch was generated before my BO labeling code
> landed, so we got another little patch here cleaning up the new code as
> well)

Thanks, Cihangir.