linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 24/28] drm/vc4: switch to drm_*_get(), drm_*

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <874ltagcei.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>
Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:47:01 -0700
From:   Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To:     Cihangir Akturk <cakturk@...il.com>
Cc:     daniel@...ll.ch, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Cihangir Akturk <cakturk@...il.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/28] drm/vc4: switch to drm_*_get(), drm_*_put() helpers

Cihangir Akturk <cakturk@...il.com> writes:

> Use drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() helpers instead of drm_*_reference()
> and drm_*_unreference() helpers.
>
> drm_*_reference() and drm_*_unreference() functions are just
> compatibility alias for drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() and should not be
> used by new code. So convert all users of compatibility functions to
> use the new APIs.

Mind if I change the subject line to "drm/vc4: Continue the switch to
drm_*_put() helpers"? to distinguish from the patch that already landed?

(Looks like your previous patch was generated before my BO labeling code
landed, so we got another little patch here cleaning up the new code as
well)

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)