[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1502694131.9844.7.camel@neuling.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 17:02:11 +1000
From: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apopple@....ibm.com, oohall@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 14/17] powerpc: Add support for setting SPRN_TIDR
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 16:06 -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> We need the SPRN_TIDR to bet set for use with fast thread-wakeup
> (core-to-core wakeup). Each thread in a process needs to have a
> unique id within the process but as explained below, for now, we
> assign globally unique thread ids to all threads in the system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 4 ++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 74
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> index fab7ff8..bf6ba63 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -232,6 +232,10 @@ struct debug_reg {
> struct thread_struct {
> unsigned long ksp; /* Kernel stack pointer */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_VAS
I'm tempted to have this always, or a new feature CONFIG_PPC_TID that's PPC_VAS
depends on.
> + unsigned long tidr;
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> unsigned long ksp_vsid;
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> index 9f3e2c9..6123859 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -1213,6 +1213,16 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct
> *prev,
> hard_irq_disable();
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_VAS
> + mtspr(SPRN_TIDR, new->thread.tidr);
how much does this hurt our context_switch benchmark in
tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/context_switch.c ?
Also you need an CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 test here (and elsewhere)
> +#endif
> + /*
> + * We can't take a PMU exception inside _switch() since there is a
> + * window where the kernel stack SLB and the kernel stack are out
> + * of sync. Hard disable here.
> + */
> + hard_irq_disable();
> +
What is this?
> /*
> * Call restore_sprs() before calling _switch(). If we move it after
> * _switch() then we miss out on calling it for new tasks. The reason
> @@ -1449,9 +1459,70 @@ void flush_thread(void)
> #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_VAS
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(vas_thread_id_lock);
> +static DEFINE_IDA(vas_thread_ida);
This IDA be per process, not global.
> +
> +/*
> + * We need to assign an unique thread id to each thread in a process. This
> + * thread id is intended to be used with the Fast Thread-wakeup (aka Core-
> + * to-core wakeup) mechanism being implemented on top of Virtual Accelerator
> + * Switchboard (VAS).
> + *
> + * To get a unique thread-id per process we could simply use task_pid_nr()
> + * but the problem is that task_pid_nr() is not yet available for the thread
> + * when copy_thread() is called. Fixing that would require changing more
> + * intrusive arch-neutral code in code path in copy_process()?.
> + *
> + * Further, to assign unique thread ids within each process, we need an
> + * atomic field (or an IDR) in task_struct, which again intrudes into the
> + * arch-neutral code.
Really?
> + * So try to assign globally unique thraed ids for now.
Yuck!
> + */
> +static int assign_thread_id(void)
> +{
> + int index;
> + int err;
> +
> +again:
> + if (!ida_pre_get(&vas_thread_ida, GFP_KERNEL))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + spin_lock(&vas_thread_id_lock);
> + err = ida_get_new_above(&vas_thread_ida, 1, &index);
We can't use 0 or 1?
> + spin_unlock(&vas_thread_id_lock);
> +
> + if (err == -EAGAIN)
> + goto again;
> + else if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + if (index > MAX_USER_CONTEXT) {
> + spin_lock(&vas_thread_id_lock);
> + ida_remove(&vas_thread_ida, index);
> + spin_unlock(&vas_thread_id_lock);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + return index;
> +}
> +
> +static void free_thread_id(int id)
> +{
> + spin_lock(&vas_thread_id_lock);
> + ida_remove(&vas_thread_ida, id);
> + spin_unlock(&vas_thread_id_lock);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_VAS */
> +
> +
> void
> release_thread(struct task_struct *t)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_VAS
> + free_thread_id(t->thread.tidr);
> +#endif
Can you restructure this to avoid the #ifdef ugliness
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1587,6 +1658,9 @@ int copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long
> usp,
> #endif
>
> setup_ksp_vsid(p, sp);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_VAS
> + p->thread.tidr = assign_thread_id();
> +#endif
Same here...
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_DSCR)) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists