[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170815094630.20836-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:46:30 +0100
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] acpi/processor: make function acpi_processor_check_duplicates static
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
The function acpi_processor_check_duplicates is local to the source and
does not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
Cleans up sparse warnings:
symbol 'acpi_processor_check_duplicates' was not declared. Should it
be static?
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index f098e25b6b41..86c10599d9f8 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static acpi_status __init acpi_processor_ids_walk(acpi_handle handle,
}
-void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void)
+static void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void)
{
/* check the correctness for all processors in ACPI namespace */
acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists