[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12257440.is5Wi1LijY@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:57:50 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi/processor: make function acpi_processor_check_duplicates static
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 11:46:30 AM CEST Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The function acpi_processor_check_duplicates is local to the source and
> does not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
>
> Cleans up sparse warnings:
> symbol 'acpi_processor_check_duplicates' was not declared. Should it
> be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> index f098e25b6b41..86c10599d9f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static acpi_status __init acpi_processor_ids_walk(acpi_handle handle,
>
> }
>
> -void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void)
> +static void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void)
> {
> /* check the correctness for all processors in ACPI namespace */
> acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
>
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists