[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3747a14c-0801-fe10-f36e-af6458fd7bdf@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:26:50 -0600
From: "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
To: gengdongjiu <gengdj.1984@...il.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>, zhengqiang10@...wei.com,
Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>,
Huangshaoyu <huangshaoyu@...wei.com>,
wuquanming <wuquanming@...wei.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Geliang Tang <geliangtang@...il.com>,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
austinwc@...eaurora.org, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, huangdaode@...ilicon.com,
wangzhou1@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: apei: fix the wrongly iterate generic error
status block
On 8/15/2017 3:34 PM, gengdongjiu wrote:
> Hi Tyler ,
>
>> Hello Boris,
>>
>> His patch fixes the define for apei_estatus_for_each_section which in turn
>> should fix ghes_do_proc(). So my patch should no longer be needed. I'm going
>> to test this out just to verify if fixes the issue I found.
> I have verified the issue about the iteration for the revision 0x300
> generic error data,
> it works well. it is good that you will verify that in your platform.
I've verified that this resolves the issue as well! I'll re-test with
the next version that adds this usage to cper_estatus_check() and add my
tested-by after that.
Thanks,
Tyler
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists