[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170816142926.GC4087514@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 07:29:27 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: Allow v2 behavior in v1 cgroup
Hello, Waiman.
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 01:27:20PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> + cpuset_v2_mode= [KNL] Enable cpuset v2 behavior in cpuset v1 cgroups.
> + In v2 mode, the cpus and mems can be restored to
> + their original values after a removal-addition
> + event sequence.
> + 0: default value, cpuset v1 keeps legacy behavior.
> + 1: cpuset v1 behaves like cpuset v2.
> +
It feels weird to make this a kernel boot param when all other options
are specified on mount time. Is there a reason why this can't be a
mount option too?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists