linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ceph: check negative offsets on ceph

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOi1vP9RYiFuscyJqetRO3p68Bj14To5whwM6EByvtjChCk0_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2017 19:57:01 +0200
From:   Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
To:     Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com>
Cc:     "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@...hat.com>, Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>,
        Ceph Development <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ceph: check negative offsets on ceph_llseek()

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com> wrote:
> Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com> writes:
>
>> When a user requests SEEK_HOLE or SEEK_DATA with a negative offset
>> ceph_llseek should return -ENXIO.  Currently -EINVAL is being returned for
>> SEEK_DATA and 0 for SEEK_HOLE.
>
> Ping
>
> This patch should make xfstest generic/448 happy.

It should or it does? ;)

I saw generic/448 failures on ext4 with Darrick's recent test change,
haven't tried ceph yet.

Thanks,

                Ilya