linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH net-next 2/3] vsock: fix vsock_dequeue/enqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <KL1P15301MB0008382F3BE8EE3313C103FEBF800@KL1P15301MB0008.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:37:47 +0000
From:   Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To:     "Jorgen S. Hansen" <jhansen@...are.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        "Stephen Hemminger" <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        George Zhang <georgezhang@...are.com>,
        Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>,
        "jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Rolf Neugebauer <rolf.neugebauer@...ker.com>,
        Dave Scott <dave.scott@...ker.com>,
        "Marcelo Cerri" <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>,
        "apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
        "olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
        "joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/3] vsock: fix vsock_dequeue/enqueue_accept race

> > On Aug 16, 2017, at 12:15 AM, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com> wrote:
> > With the current code, when vsock_dequeue_accept() is removing a sock
> > from the list, nothing prevents vsock_enqueue_accept() from adding a new
> > sock into the list concurrently. We should add a lock to protect the list.
> 
> For the VMCI socket transport, we always lock the sockets before calling into
> vsock_enqueue_accept and af_vsock.c locks the socket before calling
> vsock_dequeue_accept, so from our point of view these operations are already
> protected, but with finer granularity than a single global lock. As far as I can see,
> the virtio transport also locks the socket before calling vsock_enqueue_accept,
> so they should be fine with the current version as well, but Stefan can comment
> on that.
> 
> Jorgen

Hi Jorgen,
Thanks, you're correct.
Please ignore this patch. I'll update the hv_sock driver to add proper 
lock_sock()/relesae_sock().

Thanks,
-- Dexuan