lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2017 23:16:33 +0800
From:   Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
To:     Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>, <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        <chao@...nel.org>, <yunlong.song@...oud.com>
CC:     <miaoxie@...wei.com>, <bintian.wang@...wei.com>,
        <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: introduce cur_reserved_blocks in sysfs

I send a v3 patch, please review, and the main difference is shown below.

On 2017/8/18 18:20, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Yunlong,
>
> IMO, we don't need additional sysfs entry, how about changing a bit as below?
>
> >From 3fc8206871fe457859f1537c9dc8918b45f14601 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 23:01:56 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: support soft block reservation
>
> It supports to extend reserved_blocks sysfs interface to be soft
> threshold, which allows user configure it exceeding current available
> user space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> ---
>   Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs |  3 ++-
>   fs/f2fs/f2fs.h                          | 12 ++++++++++--
>   fs/f2fs/super.c                         |  3 ++-
>   fs/f2fs/sysfs.c                         | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>   4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> index 11b7f4ebea7c..45c3d92f77c8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> @@ -138,7 +138,8 @@ What:		/sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/reserved_blocks
>   Date:		June 2017
>   Contact:	"Chao Yu" <yuchao0@...wei.com>
>   Description:
> -		 Controls current reserved blocks in system.
> +		 Controls current reserved blocks in system, the threshold
> +		 is soft, it could exceed current avaible user space.
>
>   What:		/sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/gc_urgent
>   Date:		August 2017
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 336021b9b93e..a7b2d257e8ee 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1046,6 +1046,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
>   	block_t discard_blks;			/* discard command candidats */
>   	block_t last_valid_block_count;		/* for recovery */
>   	block_t reserved_blocks;		/* configurable reserved blocks */
> +	block_t current_reserved_blocks;	/* current reserved blocks */
>
>   	u32 s_next_generation;			/* for NFS support */
>
> @@ -1520,7 +1521,8 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>
>   	spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>   	sbi->total_valid_block_count += (block_t)(*count);
> -	avail_user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count - sbi->reserved_blocks;
> +	avail_user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count -
> +					sbi->current_reserved_blocks;
>   	if (unlikely(sbi->total_valid_block_count > avail_user_block_count)) {
>   		diff = sbi->total_valid_block_count - avail_user_block_count;
>   		*count -= diff;
> @@ -1554,6 +1556,9 @@ static inline void dec_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>   	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, sbi->total_valid_block_count < (block_t) count);
>   	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, inode->i_blocks < sectors);
>   	sbi->total_valid_block_count -= (block_t)count;
> +	if (sbi->reserved_blocks)
Add sbi->reserved_blocks != sbi->cur_reserved_blocks check
> +		sbi->current_reserved_blocks = min(sbi->reserved_blocks,
> +					sbi->current_reserved_blocks + count);
>   	spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>   	f2fs_i_blocks_write(inode, count, false, true);
>   }
> @@ -1700,7 +1705,7 @@ static inline int inc_valid_node_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>   	spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>
>   	valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count + 1;
> -	if (unlikely(valid_block_count + sbi->reserved_blocks >
> +	if (unlikely(valid_block_count + sbi->current_reserved_blocks >
>   						sbi->user_block_count)) {
>   		spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>   		goto enospc;
> @@ -1743,6 +1748,9 @@ static inline void dec_valid_node_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>
>   	sbi->total_valid_node_count--;
>   	sbi->total_valid_block_count--;
> +	if (sbi->reserved_blocks)
> +		sbi->current_reserved_blocks = min(sbi->reserved_blocks,
> +					sbi->current_reserved_blocks + 1);
change to sbi->cur_reserved_blocks++;
>
>   	spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 4c1bdcb94133..036f083bbf56 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ static int f2fs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
>   	buf->f_blocks = total_count - start_count;
>   	buf->f_bfree = user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi) + ovp_count;
>   	buf->f_bavail = user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi) -
> -						sbi->reserved_blocks;
> +						sbi->current_reserved_blocks;
>
>   	avail_node_count = sbi->total_node_count - F2FS_RESERVED_NODE_NUM;
>
> @@ -2411,6 +2411,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>   				le64_to_cpu(sbi->ckpt->valid_block_count);
>   	sbi->last_valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count;
>   	sbi->reserved_blocks = 0;
> +	sbi->current_reserved_blocks = 0;
>
>   	for (i = 0; i < NR_INODE_TYPE; i++) {
>   		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sbi->inode_list[i]);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> index 4bcaa9059026..3173a272fe7c 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> @@ -104,12 +104,23 @@ static ssize_t features_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>   	return len;
>   }
>
> +static ssize_t f2fs_reserved_blocks_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
> +					struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, char *buf)
> +{
> +	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE,
> +			"expected:	%u\ncurrent:	%u\n",
> +			sbi->reserved_blocks, sbi->current_reserved_blocks);
> +}
> +
>   static ssize_t f2fs_sbi_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>   			struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, char *buf)
>   {
>   	unsigned char *ptr = NULL;
>   	unsigned int *ui;
>
> +	if (a->struct_type == RESERVED_BLOCKS)
> +		return f2fs_reserved_blocks_show(a, sbi, buf);
> +
>   	ptr = __struct_ptr(sbi, a->struct_type);
>   	if (!ptr)
>   		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -143,12 +154,13 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>   #endif
>   	if (a->struct_type == RESERVED_BLOCKS) {
>   		spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> -		if ((unsigned long)sbi->total_valid_block_count + t >
> -				(unsigned long)sbi->user_block_count) {
> +		if (t > (unsigned long)sbi->user_block_count) {
>   			spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>   			return -EINVAL;
>   		}
>   		*ui = t;
> +		sbi->current_reserved_blocks = min(sbi->reserved_blocks,
> +				sbi->user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi));
This is not safe for support system's activation, since the user 
available space can be suddenly zero!
So I change this to only admit t < sbi->cur_reserved_blocks then change 
its value.
>   		spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>   		return count;
>   	}

-- 
Thanks,
Yunlong Song


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ