lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64936cc7-12b2-3a8f-b6dc-54f6f7cf7d6a@ispras.ru>
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2017 18:17:15 +0300
From:   Anton Volkov <avolkov@...ras.ru>
To:     matanb@...lanox.com, leonro@...lanox.com
Cc:     linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ldv-project@...uxtesting.org,
        Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
Subject: Possible race in mlx5_ib.ko

Hello.

While searching for races in the Linux kernel I've come across
"drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.ko" module. Here are questions that 
I came up with while analyzing results. Lines are given using the info 
from Linux v4.12.

Consider the following case:

Thread 1:              Thread 2:
size_write
->remove_keys          limit_write
     ent->cur--;          if (ent->cur < ent->limit)
     (mr.c: line 234)     (mr.c: line 335)
                             err = add_keys(... ent->limit - ent->cur);

If size_write and limit_write are able to work concurrently with the 
same ent then there is a possibility of a race between the accesses to 
ent->cur. In worst case in limit_write new keys wouldn't be added. Is it 
feasible from your point of view? If so, is it a benign race or a 
serious one?

Thank you for your time.

-- Anton Volkov
Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS
web: http://linuxtesting.org
e-mail: avolkov@...ras.ru

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ