linux-kernel - Re: 4.13.0-rc4 sparc64: can't allocate MSI-X affinity masks for 2 vectors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1708221932490.23061@math.ut.ee>
Date:   Tue, 22 Aug 2017 19:33:55 +0300 (EEST)
From:   Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:     hch@....de, helgaas@...nel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, qla2xxx-upstream@...gic.com,
        Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 4.13.0-rc4 sparc64: can't allocate MSI-X affinity masks for 2
 vectors

> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 01:35:49PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >> I ask because the commit log message indicates that this failure is
> >> not expected to ever happen on SMP.
> > 
> > I fear my commit message (but not the code) might be wrong.
> > irq_create_affinity_masks can return NULL any time we don't have any
> > affinity masks.  I've already had a discussion about this elsewhere
> > with Bjorn, and I suspect we need to kill the warning or move it
> > to irq_create_affinity_masks only for genuine failure cases.
> 
> This is a rather large machine with 64 or more cpus and several NUMA
> nodes.  Why wouldn't there be any affinity masks available?

T5120 with 1 slot and 32 threads total. I have not configured any NUM on 
it is there any reason for that?

-- 
Meelis Roos (mroos@...ux.ee)