linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][drm-next] drm/amdgpu: remove duplicate return statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8045f72d-34d5-473d-ac9b-56495698dc8f@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Aug 2017 14:24:49 -0400
From:   Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@....com>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][drm-next] drm/amdgpu: remove duplicate return statement

I must have added that accidentally when cherry-picking an internal
patch for upstreaming. Thanks for catching it.

Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>

Regards,
  Felix


On 2017-08-23 09:17 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Remove a redundant identical return statement, it has no use.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1454586 ("Structurally dead code")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c
> index fb6e5dbd5a03..309f2419c6d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c
> @@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ static const struct kfd2kgd_calls kfd2kgd = {
>  struct kfd2kgd_calls *amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_8_0_get_functions(void)
>  {
>  	return (struct kfd2kgd_calls *)&kfd2kgd;
> -	return (struct kfd2kgd_calls *)&kfd2kgd;
>  }
>  
>  static inline struct amdgpu_device *get_amdgpu_device(struct kgd_dev *kgd)