[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170824084556.GA19418@lst.de>
Date:   Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:45:56 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Benjamin Block <bblock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] bsg-lib: fix kernel panic resulting from
        missing allocation of reply-buffer
>  /**
> - * bsg_destroy_job - routine to teardown/delete a bsg job
> + * bsg_teardown_job - routine to teardown a bsg job
>   * @job: bsg_job that is to be torn down
>   */
> -static void bsg_destroy_job(struct kref *kref)
> +static void bsg_teardown_job(struct kref *kref)
Why this rename?  The destroy name seems to be one of the most
common patterns for the kref_put callbacks.
Otherwise this looks fine:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
