[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170824084556.GA19418@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:45:56 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Benjamin Block <bblock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] bsg-lib: fix kernel panic resulting from
missing allocation of reply-buffer
> /**
> - * bsg_destroy_job - routine to teardown/delete a bsg job
> + * bsg_teardown_job - routine to teardown a bsg job
> * @job: bsg_job that is to be torn down
> */
> -static void bsg_destroy_job(struct kref *kref)
> +static void bsg_teardown_job(struct kref *kref)
Why this rename? The destroy name seems to be one of the most
common patterns for the kref_put callbacks.
Otherwise this looks fine:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists