[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170824144152.GC17193@bill-the-cat>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:41:52 -0400
From: Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <bardliao@...ltek.com>,
Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: rt5677: Reintroduce I2C device IDs
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:31:25PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 16:28:29 +0200,
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:05:25 +0200,
> > Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 01:39:12PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 05:29:33PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 21:51 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > > > Not all devices with ACPI and this combination of sound devices will
> > > > > > have the required information provided via ACPI. Reintroduce the I2C
> > > > > > device ID to restore sound functionality on on the Chromebook 'Samus'
> > > > > > model.
> > > > >
> > > > > > This is a regression from v4.12 on my laptop (a Chromebook 'Samus'
> > > > > > that's not running ChromeOS). My fault for getting out of the habit
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > trying -rc1 when it comes out and not spotting this sooner. I'm not
> > > > > > 100% sure if this fix is correct for all cases as I'm only able to
> > > > > > test
> > > > > > my hardware here, and this does fix my laptop.
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you sure the commit ddc9e69b9dc2 ("ASoC: rt5677: Hide platform data
> > > > > in the module sources") does not fix your issue?
> > > >
> > > > As that's not in master yet I can't tell. Can you give me a pointer to
> > > > somewhere? Thanks!
> > >
> > > OK, my bad, it has a different hash upstream,
>
> BTW, the hash above is correct. It's in Mark's asoc tree (and in
> linux-next). You might have cherry-picked a wrong one, I suppose?
Alright, I read-things to quickly, and to be clear:
(a) "ASoC: rt5677: Hide platform data in the module sources" is _not_ in
Linus' tree (I confused this with a different commit) and _is_ in Mark's
ASoC for-next branch currently.
(b) Applying just that patch on top of Linus' tree _does_ fix my
regression (an Oops and non-functional audio) with audio and now sound
works well, as expected.
Can we please get that as a fix for this release? Thanks!
--
Tom
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists