linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: avoid false positive gcc-8 warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Aug 2017 09:28:33 -0700
From:   James Smart <jsmart2021@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: avoid false positive gcc-8 warning

On 8/24/2017 4:01 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> I have also come up with a different workaround of my own
> (sorry for the broken formatting here) and tested it successfully
> over night. I have definitely spent more time on it than it was
> worth now. Let me know if you prefer that version over yours,
> then I'll submit that as a proper patch with your Ack.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> 
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.h

I'm ok with either solution. I prefer less change but this is a trivial 
thing.

Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>

-- james