[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170824162737.7813-7-jolsa@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:27:33 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] perf values: Fix thread index bug
We are taking wrong index (+1) for first thread, which
leaves thread with index 0 unused and uninitialized.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/values.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/values.c b/tools/perf/util/values.c
index 5de2e15e2eda..9ac36bf2c438 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/values.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/values.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static int perf_read_values__findnew_thread(struct perf_read_values *values,
return i;
}
- i = values->threads + 1;
+ i = values->threads;
values->value[i] = malloc(values->counters_max * sizeof(**values->value));
if (!values->value[i]) {
pr_debug("failed to allocate read_values counters array");
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static int perf_read_values__findnew_thread(struct perf_read_values *values,
}
values->pid[i] = pid;
values->tid[i] = tid;
- values->threads = i;
+ values->threads = i + 1;
return i;
}
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists