linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/mlock: use page_zone() instead of page_zone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f8f86eed-7613-f1fb-0c3a-b677a4507558@suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:48:42 +0200
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mlock: use page_zone() instead of page_zone_id()

On 08/25/2017 01:59 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 01:05:15PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> +CC Mel
>>
>> On 08/24/2017 09:20 AM, js1304@...il.com wrote:
>>> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
>>>
>>> page_zone_id() is a specialized function to compare the zone for the pages
>>> that are within the section range. If the section of the pages are
>>> different, page_zone_id() can be different even if their zone is the same.
>>> This wrong usage doesn't cause any actual problem since
>>> __munlock_pagevec_fill() would be called again with failed index. However,
>>> it's better to use more appropriate function here.
>>
>> Hmm using zone id was part of the series making munlock faster. Too bad
>> it's doing the wrong thing on some memory models. Looks like it wasn't
>> evaluated in isolation, but only as part of the pagevec usage (commit
>> 7a8010cd36273) but most likely it wasn't contributing too much to the
>> 14% speedup.
> 
> I roughly checked that patch and it seems that performance improvement
> of that commit isn't related to page_zone_id() usage. With
> page_zone(), we would have more chance that do a job as a batch.
> 
>>
>>> This patch is also preparation for futher change about page_zone_id().
>>
>> Out of curiosity, what kind of change?
>>
> 
> I prepared one more patch that prevent another user of page_zone_id()
> since it is too tricky. However, I don't submit it. That description
> should be removed. :/

OK. You can add

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>

> Thanks.
>