linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] devfreq: Convert to using %pOF instead of full

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <599F7CC8.1040406@samsung.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:26:32 +0900
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devfreq: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name

On 2017년 08월 24일 23:23, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On 2017년 08월 24일 03:09, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:25 AM, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2017년 07월 19일 06:42, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>>> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
>>>>>> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
>>>>>> of the full path string for each node.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>>>>> Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
>>>>>> Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
>>>>>> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  drivers/devfreq/devfreq-event.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq-event.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq-event.c
>>>>>> index 8648b32ebc89..d67242d87744 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq-event.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq-event.c
>>>>>> @@ -277,8 +277,8 @@ int devfreq_event_get_edev_count(struct device *dev)
>>>>>>                                             sizeof(u32));
>>>>>>     if (count < 0) {
>>>>>>             dev_err(dev,
>>>>>> -                   "failed to get the count of devfreq-event in %s node\n",
>>>>>> -                   dev->of_node->full_name);
>>>>>> +                   "failed to get the count of devfreq-event in %pOF node\n",
>>>>>> +                   dev->of_node);
>>>>>>             return count;
>>>>>>     }
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
>>>
>>> Please take this thru the devfreq tree.
>>
>> This patch was merged on devfreq tree.
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mzx/devfreq.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=7f46535e8a2e3c3e415e55eaadcb9d9a153a5300
> 
> Okay, it's not showing up in linux-next which is why I asked.

As I knew, devfreq maintainer has not yet asked
the inclusion of devfreq tree in linux-next.

To Myungjoo,
You can ask to 'Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>'
for the inclusion of devfreq tree in linux-next.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mzx/devfreq.git for-next

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics