[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170825161607.6v6beg4zjktllt2z@node.shutemov.name>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 19:16:07 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] mm: introduce mmap3 for safely defining new mmap
flags
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 09:02:36AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 06:58:03PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > Not all archs are ready for this:
> >
> > arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/mman.h:#define MAP_TYPE 0x03 /* Mask for type of mapping */
> > arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/mman.h:#define MAP_FIXED 0x04 /* Interpret addr exactly */
>
> I'd be happy to say that we should not care about parisc for
> persistent memory. We'll just have to find a way to exclude
> parisc without making life too ugly.
I don't think creapling mmap() interface for one arch is the right way to
go. I think the interface should be universal.
I may imagine MAP_DIRECT can be useful not only for persistent memory.
For tmpfs instead of mlock()?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists