[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df4641f2-93ca-4923-bb6b-5a43f709859c@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:41:50 -0500
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: brijesh.singh@....com,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>, paolo.bonzini@...il.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree
On 08/25/2017 03:05 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/08/2017 18:53, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>>>
> Neither my version nor yours is correct. :) The right one has [0][i]
> and [1][i] (I inverted the indices by mistake).
>
> With that change, you can include my
>
> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>
Ingo,
I assuming that this patch should be sent through the tip since SME support
came from tip. I will be submitting the patch very soon.
-Brijesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists