linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <575d1d5a-5cfb-49b4-0ce7-b78372739cb6@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Aug 2017 22:42:54 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>, paolo.bonzini@...il.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree

On 25/08/2017 22:41, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>>>>
> 
>> Neither my version nor yours is correct. :)  The right one has [0][i]
>> and [1][i] (I inverted the indices by mistake).
>>
>> With that change, you can include my
>>
>> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>>
> 
> Ingo,
> 
> I assuming that this patch should be sent through the tip since SME support
> came from tip. I will be submitting the patch very soon.

Yes, that is correct.  I cannot apply it directly to the KVM tree.

Paolo