[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11fc2d4e-bcf4-9a1c-6d73-2e67aab2a1ed@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:09:18 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Peter Waskiewicz Jr <peter.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: connector: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation
in cn_queue_alloc_callback_entry()
> Did coccinelle trip on the message
I suggest to reconsider this implementation detail with the combination
of a function call like “kzalloc”.
A script for the semantic patch language can point various update candidates
out according to a source code search pattern which is similar to “OOM_MESSAGE”
in the script “checkpatch.pl”.
> or the fact you weren't returning NULL?
How does this concern fit to my update suggestion?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists