linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Retain delay/setup/hold values when configuring bus frequency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170829084508.edybxf6zctgx4xwy@ninjato>
Date:   Tue, 29 Aug 2017 10:45:09 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Cc:     linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, brendanhiggins@...gle.com,
        benh@...nel.crashing.org, joel@....id.au, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ryan_chen@...eedtech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Retain delay/setup/hold values when
 configuring bus frequency


> I'd argue that Brendan's patch should go in for-current as well,
> because it fixes a divisor rounding error for the ast2500 (bus is
> clocked faster than requested).

Hmmm, pity, the description said "potential" issue so I decided for
for-next. However, I wouldn't like to reshuffle my branches much so
short before the merge window. So, would it be OK with you that you send
both patches to stable after rc1?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)