linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Retain delay/setup/hold values when configuring bus frequency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1503996389.5933.9.camel@aj.id.au>
Date:   Tue, 29 Aug 2017 18:16:29 +0930
From:   Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, brendanhiggins@...gle.com,
        benh@...nel.crashing.org, joel@....id.au, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ryan_chen@...eedtech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Retain delay/setup/hold values when
 configuring bus frequency

On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 10:45 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > I'd argue that Brendan's patch should go in for-current as well,
> > because it fixes a divisor rounding error for the ast2500 (bus is
> > clocked faster than requested).
> 
> Hmmm, pity, the description said "potential" issue so I decided for
> for-next. However, I wouldn't like to reshuffle my branches much so
> short before the merge window. So, would it be OK with you that you send
> both patches to stable after rc1?
> 

Will do.

Cheers,

Andrew
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)