lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170830144409.qtewwaffwof34hai@flea.lan>
Date:   Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:44:09 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@...h-aachen.de>
Cc:     linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] arm64: allwinner: a64: add SPI nodes

Hi Stefan,

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:26:51PM +0200, Stefan Brüns wrote:
> The A64 SPI controllers are register compatible to the h3/h5 SPI
> controllers.
> 
> The A64 has two SPI controllers, each with a single chip select.
> The handles for the DMA channels (23/24 for SPI0/SPI1) are omitted,
> as the A64 DMA controller node is currently missing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@...h-aachen.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> index bd0f33b77f57..373cd14f0206 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> @@ -325,6 +325,16 @@
>  				drive-strength = <40>;
>  			};
>  
> +			spi0_pins: spi0 {
> +				pins = "PC0", "PC1", "PC2", "PC3";
> +				function = "spi0";
> +			};
> +
> +			spi1_pins: spi1 {
> +				pins = "PD0", "PD1", "PD2", "PD3";
> +				function = "spi1";
> +			};
> +
>  			uart0_pins_a: uart0@0 {
>  				pins = "PB8", "PB9";
>  				function = "uart0";
> @@ -527,5 +537,35 @@
>  			#address-cells = <1>;
>  			#size-cells = <0>;
>  		};
> +
> +		spi0: spi@...68000 {
> +			compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-spi";
> +			reg = <0x01c68000 0x1000>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 65 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_SPI0>, <&ccu CLK_SPI0>;
> +			clock-names = "ahb", "mod";
> +			pinctrl-names = "default";
> +			pinctrl-0 = <&spi0_pins>;
> +			resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_SPI0>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +			num-cs = <1>;
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> +			#size-cells = <0>;
> +		};
> +
> +		spi1: spi@...69000 {
> +			compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-spi";
> +			reg = <0x01c69000 0x1000>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 66 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_SPI1>, <&ccu CLK_SPI1>;
> +			clock-names = "ahb", "mod";
> +			pinctrl-names = "default";
> +			pinctrl-0 = <&spi1_pins>;
> +			resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_SPI1>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +			num-cs = <1>;
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> +			#size-cells = <0>;
> +		};

Those nodes are ordered by ascending physical base address, so they
belong a bit above were you placed them.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ