[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170830174228.sx5jgtxxy56zq47t@ninjato>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 19:42:28 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Florian Larysch <fl@...1.de>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 00/16] eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 06:19:02PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Wolfram,
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> >
> >> I don't have a DT based system at hand now, but I'll test it again and
> >> let you know probably tomorrow.
> >
> > I will try again today, too. Thanks!
> >
>
> Ok, I had some time to do some tests again. I used an ARM Chromebook
> (Exynos Peach Pi) that has an I2C touchpad (Atmel maXTouch).
I tried again as well and it still fails for me.
> Tested the following cases:
I think we should talk about the same case: Let me repeat what I did:
1) I added your patch "eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table"
2) I added an EEPROM node to an I2C
+ eeprom@50 {
+ compatible = "renesas,24c01";
+ reg = <0x50>;
+ };
-> no at24 binding to the device
3) I revert your patch
-> at24 binding to the device
I think you should be able to test this DTS snipplet even without a real
eeprom. Especially after applying this to the at24 driver.
diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
index 79c5c39be29cac..f9f547680c53db 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
@@ -805,11 +805,6 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
* Perform a one-byte test read to verify that the
* chip is functional.
*/
- err = at24_read(at24, 0, &test_byte, 1);
- if (err) {
- err = -ENODEV;
- goto err_clients;
- }
at24->nvmem_config.name = dev_name(&client->dev);
at24->nvmem_config.dev = &client->dev;
Can you check this?
Thanks,
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists