[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1633009.GLYYEVNxi7@phil>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 23:54:03 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Jagan Teki <jagannadh.teki@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] of: Add vendor prefix for Amarula Solutions
Hi Rob,
Am Donnerstag, 31. August 2017, 15:08:55 CEST schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:21:42PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > From: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
> >
> > Added 'amarula' as a vendor prefix for Amarula Solutions,
> > specialist in Embedded and Opensource solutions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
just to clarify ... you did apply the last vendor-prefixes yourself
to prevent conflicts. From the Ack, I assume I should merge that
with the devicetree itself, right?
I'm fine with it either way.
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists