linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] of: Add vendor prefix for Amarula Solutions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+4cnY_4O_QVdkF=ZL8Ty1k_2cTBhb7uoVVxwM8QkcLUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Sep 2017 07:23:38 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:     Jagan Teki <jagannadh.teki@...il.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] of: Add vendor prefix for Amarula Solutions

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Am Donnerstag, 31. August 2017, 15:08:55 CEST schrieb Rob Herring:
>> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:21:42PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> > From: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
>> >
>> > Added 'amarula' as a vendor prefix for Amarula Solutions,
>> > specialist in Embedded and Opensource solutions.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
>> > ---
>> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
> just to clarify ... you did apply the last vendor-prefixes yourself
> to prevent conflicts. From the Ack, I assume I should merge that
> with the devicetree itself, right?

I have not applied. You can apply it.

Rob