linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 3/4] phy: rcar-gen3-usb2: add SoC-specific parameter for dedicated pins

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SG2PR06MB098116595A47B34EDDBE2AE5D8920@SG2PR06MB0981.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Sep 2017 02:44:28 +0000
From:   Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
To:     Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        "kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] phy: rcar-gen3-usb2: add SoC-specific parameter for
 dedicated pins


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergei Shtylyov
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 6:43 PM
> 
> On 8/31/2017 10:31 AM, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> 
> > This patch adds SoC-specific parameter to avoid reading/writing
> > specific registers wronly if this driver runs on a SoC which doesn't
> 
>     Wrongly? Perhaps "incorrectly"?

Thank you for the point. In v2 patch, I already revised it as "wrongly".

Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda

> > have dedicated pins (e.g. R-Car D3).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
> [...]
> 
> MBR, Sergei