[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170901173948.GM4831@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 14:39:48 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: kan.liang@...el.com, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
eranian@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/5] support PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR (user)
Em Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 05:45:02PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 01:11:07PM -0400, kan.liang@...el.com wrote:
> > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
> >
> > The patch series is to support PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR in user perf tool.
> > The kernel patch has been merged, which commit ID is
> > fc7ce9c74c3a ("perf/core, x86: Add PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR").
> >
> > Changes since V1:
> > - Don't mandate SAMPLE_ADDR when SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR
> > - Update change log
> >
> > Kan Liang (5):
> > perf tools: support new sample type for physical address
> > perf tools: add sort option for physical address
> > perf mem: support physical address
> > perf script: support physical address
> > perf test: add test case for PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR
>
> apart from the nit in patch 1
Which I folded your patch into
> Tested/Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
I think in this case a Tested-by: is a super ack, right?
So I'll leave it as:
Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Ok?
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists