[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170901174659.GA10349@krava>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 19:46:59 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: kan.liang@...el.com, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
eranian@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/5] support PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR (user)
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 02:39:48PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 05:45:02PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 01:11:07PM -0400, kan.liang@...el.com wrote:
> > > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
> > >
> > > The patch series is to support PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR in user perf tool.
> > > The kernel patch has been merged, which commit ID is
> > > fc7ce9c74c3a ("perf/core, x86: Add PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR").
> > >
> > > Changes since V1:
> > > - Don't mandate SAMPLE_ADDR when SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR
> > > - Update change log
> > >
> > > Kan Liang (5):
> > > perf tools: support new sample type for physical address
> > > perf tools: add sort option for physical address
> > > perf mem: support physical address
> > > perf script: support physical address
> > > perf test: add test case for PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR
> >
> > apart from the nit in patch 1
>
> Which I folded your patch into
>
> > Tested/Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
>
> I think in this case a Tested-by: is a super ack, right?
>
> So I'll leave it as:
>
> Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
>
> Ok?
ook ;-)
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists